Zimbabwe's Assault on Press Freedom: The Unjust Arrest of Journalist Blessed Mhlanga

 

In a blatant affront to press freedom, Zimbabwean authorities have arrested esteemed journalist Blessed Mhlanga, a move that has drawn widespread condemnation from media watchdogs and human rights organizations. Mhlanga, a senior journalist with Alpha Media Holdings, was detained on February 24, 2025, after voluntarily presenting himself to the Harare police. He faces charges under Section 136 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, accused of "transmitting data messages that incite violence and damage to property."

The allegations stem from interviews Mhlanga conducted with Blessing Geza, a liberation war veteran and central committee member of the ruling ZANU-PF party. In these interviews, Geza criticized President Emmerson Mnangagwa's leadership and called for his resignation, citing failures to address corruption and incompetence. Geza also hinted at organizing a nationwide shutdown to pressure Mnangagwa's departure.

Media organizations and rights groups have decried Mhlanga's arrest as an attempt to intimidate journalists and suppress dissenting voices. The Zimbabwe National Editors Forum (ZINEF) labeled the arrest "disturbing," emphasizing that Mhlanga was merely fulfilling his journalistic duty by providing a platform for diverse viewpoints.

Amnesty International also condemned the detention, describing it as a "brazen attack on press freedom." The organization highlighted a troubling pattern in Zimbabwe, where authorities misuse legal provisions to persecute journalists and stifle free expression. 

Mhlanga's legal representative, Chris Mhike, expressed concern over the deteriorating state of press freedom in the country, noting that such actions are designed to instill fear among media practitioners. This incident is not isolated; it reflects a broader trend of media suppression in Zimbabwe. In recent years, journalists have faced arrests, harassment, and intimidation for their work. Notably, in 2020, investigative journalist Hopewell Chin'ono was arrested multiple times for exposing government corruption, underscoring the perilous environment for media professionals in the nation. 

The international community must not remain silent in the face of such blatant violations of press freedom. A free and independent press is a cornerstone of any democratic society, serving as a watchdog against corruption and governance failures. The arrest of Blessed Mhlanga is a direct assault on this principle and sets a dangerous precedent for the treatment of journalists in Zimbabwe.

As Mhlanga awaits his bail ruling, scheduled for February 27, 2025, it is imperative that both local and global stakeholders advocate for his immediate release and the protection of press freedoms in Zimbabwe. The government's continued crackdown on independent journalism not only undermines democratic values but also erodes public trust in state institutions.

In solidarity with Mhlanga and all journalists facing persecution, we echo the call for justice and the unwavering defense of the right to free expression.

South Africa Challenges Big Tech: Google and Meta Face Scrutiny Over Anti-Competitive Practices

South Africa’s Competition Commission has taken a firm stance against U.S. tech giants Google and Meta, accusing them of anti-competitive behavior that negatively impacts the country's media industry. The Commission’s provisional report, released on February 24, 2025, outlines proposed measures to ensure fair competition and better representation of local media in the digital space.

Google Ordered to Compensate Local Media

The Commission's investigation found that Google's search algorithm disproportionately favors global news sources over South African media outlets. This trend, the report suggests, has significantly contributed to the decline of local media over the past decade.

To address the imbalance, the Competition Commission has recommended that Google pay local news publishers between R300 million and R500 million annually over the next three to five years. Additionally, Google has been urged to adjust its search algorithm to increase traffic referrals to South African news sites, ensuring local voices get better visibility.

Meta and X Directed to Restore Referral Traffic

The report also highlights concerns regarding Meta's Facebook and Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter), accusing them of deprioritizing posts from South African news outlets when they contain external links. This practice, according to the Commission, has led to a significant drop in traffic to local media websites, affecting their revenue streams and overall sustainability.

As a corrective measure, the Commission has proposed that Meta and X restore referral traffic to previous levels and allow South African media outlets to better monetize their content on these platforms.

Big Tech Pushes Back

Google has strongly opposed the findings, arguing that its services already provide substantial value to South African publishers. The company claims that in 2023 alone, its platforms generated an estimated R350 million worth of referral traffic for local news outlets while earning less than R19 million from advertising on news-related searches. Google also pointed to its ongoing investments in training, partnerships, and other initiatives aimed at supporting South Africa’s media ecosystem.

Meta, meanwhile, has not yet issued a public response to the Competition Commission’s report.

What’s Next?

The provisional report is open for public comment until April 7, 2025, after which the Commission will release its final report later this year. Should Google, Meta, and X fail to implement the recommended changes within six months of the final report’s release, they could face a digital advertising levy of 5% to 10%.

This move positions South Africa as a leading nation in challenging the dominance of Big Tech in the digital media space. It also signals a broader global trend where governments are increasingly pushing for regulations that protect local journalism from the overwhelming influence of multinational tech corporations.

As the battle unfolds, all eyes will be on how Google, Meta, and X respond—and whether South Africa’s bold move will inspire other nations to take similar action against digital monopolies.

Remembering Sam Nujoma: The Legacy of Namibia’s Founding Father

 

On February 8, 2025, Namibia lost one of its greatest sons—Sam Nujoma, the nation’s founding president and legendary freedom fighter. At 95, Nujoma passed away after weeks of hospitalization in Windhoek. His departure marks the end of an era, but his legacy remains firmly embedded in the fabric of Namibian history.

The Journey to Independence

Born on May 12, 1929, in the northern region of Ongandjera, Nujoma came from humble beginnings. His early life was spent herding cattle and working in subsistence farming, yet he remained determined to seek education and a better future. Limited schooling opportunities did not deter him, and he later found work as a railway dining-car steward, an experience that broadened his perspective and political awareness.

In 1959, Nujoma co-founded the Ovamboland People’s Organization (OPO), which later evolved into the South West Africa People’s Organization (SWAPO) in 1960. As SWAPO’s leader, he spearheaded Namibia’s armed struggle against South African apartheid rule, enduring nearly three decades in exile. His relentless pursuit of freedom led to Namibia gaining independence on March 21, 1990, making him the country’s first president.

A Leader and Nation Builder

Nujoma served as Namibia’s president for three consecutive terms from 1990 to 2005. His leadership focused on national unity, reconciliation, and institutional development. Unlike many post-colonial leaders, he ensured the participation of all citizens, including white Namibians, in the government’s rebuilding efforts. Under his administration, Namibia transitioned into a stable democracy with a growing economy and improved social services.

However, his tenure was not without controversy. Critics pointed to his control over the media, suppression of political dissent, and strong opposition to homosexuality. Despite these concerns, he remained an admired statesman, celebrated for his unwavering commitment to Namibia’s sovereignty and development. 

A Gallant Pan-Africanist

Beyond his contributions to Namibia, Nujoma was a dedicated Pan-Africanist who championed the liberation of the entire continent from colonial rule. He worked closely with other African freedom fighters and supported anti-colonial movements in Angola, Zimbabwe, and South Africa. His vision extended beyond Namibia, advocating for African unity, economic independence, and self-reliance. He firmly believed that Africa’s destiny lay in the hands of its people and continuously promoted solidarity among African nations.

International Influence and Recognition

Globally, Nujoma maintained relationships with a diverse range of allies. From Cuba and North Korea to Russia, China, and Western nations, he balanced international diplomacy to ensure Namibia’s strategic positioning. In 1993, he became the first African leader welcomed by U.S. President Bill Clinton at the White House, a recognition of his significance in global politics.

A Legacy That Endures

As Namibia mourns the passing of its founding father, the country also celebrates the resilience, courage, and vision that defined his life. Nujoma’s role in shaping an independent Namibia is undeniable, and his legacy will continue to inspire generations of Namibians striving for justice, equality, and progress.

His passing is not just the loss of a leader but the departure of a revolutionary who dedicated his life to the liberation of his people. While he may be gone, his spirit and contributions to Namibia and Africa will never be forgotten.

South Africa Stands Tall: Ramaphosa Declares 'We Will Not Be Bullied’ in Defiant SONA Speech"

In a bold and unwavering State of the Nation Address (SONA), South African President Cyril Ramaphosa sent a strong message to the world—particularly to the United States—declaring that South Africa “will not be bullied.” His speech, marked by resilience and national pride, comes amid rising diplomatic tensions between Pretoria and Washington.

The Growing Rift Between South Africa and the U.S.

Relations between the two nations have been strained due to recent U.S. criticisms of South Africa’s foreign policy stance, economic reforms, and strategic alliances. The U.S. has voiced concerns over South Africa’s continued relations with countries that Washington considers adversaries, particularly Russia and China. Additionally, economic policies such as land reforms and Black economic empowerment initiatives have sparked debate, with American leaders expressing strong opposition.

One of the most controversial moments came when U.S. officials accused South Africa of supplying arms to Russia, a claim that Pretoria has vehemently denied. The accusations led to economic repercussions, including fluctuations in the South African rand and threats of trade restrictions under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). 

Ramaphosa’s Defiant Response

During his SONA speech, President Ramaphosa addressed these challenges head-on, stating:

"We are a sovereign nation. We will determine our path, our policies, and our future. We will not be dictated to, and we will not be bullied."

His words were met with applause from lawmakers and citizens who have grown increasingly frustrated with what they see as Western interference in African affairs. The President reaffirmed South Africa’s commitment to diplomacy and economic partnerships but made it clear that the nation would not compromise its principles under external pressure.

Economic and Trade Concerns

One of the key sticking points in the U.S.-South Africa tensions is trade. South Africa benefits from AGOA, which provides African countries with preferential access to U.S. markets. However, the U.S. has hinted at reviewing South Africa’s inclusion in the program, citing concerns over its international alliances and domestic policies.

Ramaphosa acknowledged these economic risks but remained firm:

"We will work with all partners who respect our sovereignty. Our economic future cannot and will not be held hostage by any single nation."

South Africa is already exploring alternative trade partnerships with BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), as well as strengthening ties with the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).

South Africa’s Stance on Global Conflicts

The U.S. has also been critical of South Africa’s neutral stance on global conflicts, particularly the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Palestine crisis. While Western nations have pressured Pretoria to take a firm position, Ramaphosa has consistently advocated for diplomatic dialogue rather than choosing sides.

During his address, he reinforced this position:

"We do not believe in taking sides in conflicts where dialogue and peace are needed. We are a nation that stands for justice, fairness, and human rights."

A Call for Unity and Resilience

Ramaphosa’s speech was not just a response to international pressures but also a rallying call for South Africans to stand together in resilience. With economic struggles, power shortages, and social challenges at home, his message was clear—South Africa must remain united, independent, and forward-looking.

"We are a people of strength. We have faced greater challenges before, and we have overcome them. We will rise, not because others allow us to, but because we choose to."

The Road Ahead

The fallout from Ramaphosa’s speech is yet to be fully realized, but one thing is certain—South Africa has drawn its line in the sand. Whether the U.S. will escalate its stance or seek diplomatic resolutions remains to be seen. However, for South Africans, the President’s message is a powerful affirmation that their nation will not bow to external pressures.

In the coming months, South Africa will have to navigate these complex diplomatic waters carefully, balancing its economic needs with its commitment to sovereignty. But if Ramaphosa’s words are anything to go by, the country is ready to face whatever comes its way—on its own terms.

U.S. Escalates Diplomatic Attacks on South Africa: Neocolonialism or Genuine Concern?

 

The United States has once again stirred controversy in its foreign policy approach toward South Africa. In a surprising yet revealing move, the U.S. has decided to boycott the upcoming G20 foreign ministers' meeting in Johannesburg, which is being chaired by South Africa this year. This decision follows an ongoing pattern of tensions between the two nations, particularly around South Africa's land reform policies. The question remains: Why is the U.S. so invested in this issue? Is this genuine concern for property rights, or is it a case of neocolonial interference in African sovereignty?

The Land Reform Debate

At the heart of the U.S. opposition is South Africa’s land reform policy, which seeks to address historical injustices. President Cyril Ramaphosa recently signed into law a bill allowing the government to expropriate land without compensation under specific circumstances. This policy aims to correct the extreme land imbalance where 7% of the white minority population owns over 70% of the country’s farmland, while the Black majority remains largely landless—a direct legacy of colonialism and apartheid.

The U.S., led by figures such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio, has strongly opposed this reform, claiming it violates property rights and could deter foreign investment. US President Donald Trump even threatened to cut U.S. aid to South Africa over the issue, labeling the land reform effort as "land confiscation." However, critics argue that this stance ignores the historical theft of land from Black South Africans and dismisses the necessity of redistribution as a form of restorative justice. 

U.S. Interests: Protecting Corporate and Individual Wealth?

Many observers question whether the U.S. is genuinely concerned about human rights or if it is merely protecting economic and political interests. Some theories suggest that the U.S. is shielding wealthy individuals, including the family of billionaire Elon Musk, whose father, Errol Musk, still resides in South Africa. Musk has been a vocal critic of the country’s economic policies, including its land reform initiatives. Could the U.S. stance be, in part, influenced by powerful corporate and individual stakeholders who stand to lose from the redistribution of land?

Beyond individual interests, U.S. foreign policy has long been tied to economic control over developing nations. South Africa, as an economic powerhouse in Africa, represents a strategic interest for Western nations. If South Africa successfully implements land reform and strengthens its economy without U.S. aid and influence, it could set a precedent for other African nations to follow suit—potentially undermining U.S. influence on the continent.

Neocolonialism in the 21st Century

The continued U.S. opposition to South Africa’s policies raises a larger issue: the persistence of neocolonialism in Africa. By leveraging economic threats and diplomatic boycotts, the U.S. is exerting pressure in a manner that mirrors historical colonial tactics—controlling African policies through financial manipulation rather than direct rule.

South Africa must ask itself: Does it need U.S. approval to forge its own future? Is it time to shift away from reliance on Western aid and establish partnerships that respect African sovereignty? The increasing presence of alternative global powers, such as China and Russia, suggests that Africa has options beyond Western-dominated financial and trade systems.

A Lesson for the Rest of Africa

South Africa’s experience serves as a cautionary tale for other African nations. The time is ripe for African countries to reject foreign blackmail disguised as "concern for democracy and human rights." Many African nations rely heavily on Western aid and partnerships, but these often come with strings attached—compromising national sovereignty and economic independence.

South Africa must take a firm stand against undue U.S. influence. It is time for African nations to define their own policies without fear of economic retribution. As history has shown, the path to true independence is fraught with challenges, but it is a necessary step toward economic liberation and self-determination.

Conclusion

The U.S. boycott of the G20 meeting in Johannesburg and its continued attacks on South Africa’s land reform efforts reveal a deeper struggle: the battle between African self-determination and Western economic control. Whether it is under the guise of protecting property rights, foreign investments, or individual billionaires, the U.S.’s actions speak to a broader strategy of influence and control.

South Africa, and indeed the rest of Africa, must take heed of this moment and push for policies that serve their people rather than foreign interests. The time to break free from neocolonial chains is now.

Time to Break Free from Colonial Legacies: Africa's Path to Sovereignty and Self-Sustenance, with South Africa Under Attack in the Name of Donor Money

The recent comments from Donald Trump, warning South Africa against proceeding with land reform aimed at rectifying the wrongs of the colonial era, highlight the ongoing neocolonial pressures that Africa faces today. Trump’s threat to cut financial aid unless South Africa abandons its land reform program is not only an embarrassment to South African leadership but also a glaring example of foreign bullying. The reported attempt by President Cyril Ramaphosa to explain the country’s policy to Elon Musk, a close associate of Trump, underscores Africa's vulnerability to external influence. South Africa, like every other African nation, is a sovereign state with the right to determine its policies without the need to seek permission or appease foreign powers—especially when those powers have historically benefitted from the exploitation of Africa’s resources.

In recent history, three African nations—Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger—have made bold strides in reclaiming their sovereignty by breaking free from the lingering influences of their colonial pasts. Their moves to resist foreign control and reclaim their resources come at a pivotal time when Africa’s sovereignty and self-determination are being continuously tested—not just by external forces, but by the remnants of neocolonial tactics that still hold sway over the continent. 

These nations' actions serve as a powerful reminder of Africa's long-standing struggle for true independence. While many African countries have attained political independence, true economic and social freedom remains a distant dream for many. Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger have taken a stand against the structures that have long kept them tethered to their former colonial masters, sparking a broader conversation about the need for Africa to regain control over its destiny and step out from under the shadows of colonial rule.

The idea that African nations must placate foreign powers to secure aid is a form of bullying that should no longer be tolerated. Africa is a continent rich in natural resources, human capital, and economic potential. The notion that African nations need external funding to survive is a consequence of a long history of dependency—one that must come to an end. Instead of relying on Western aid, African nations must invest in their own resources, develop self-sufficiency, and seek collaborative partnerships on equal terms with other nations.

While Africa undeniably faces significant challenges such as corruption, poverty, and political instability, these problems are exacerbated by the exploitative relationships that persist with former colonial powers and the global capitalist system. To overcome these challenges, Africa must foster good governance, transparency, and the protection of its resources. By breaking free from colonial legacies, African nations will not only improve the lives of their citizens but also position themselves as equals on the global stage.

It is time for Africa to sever the chains of colonialism and the system of exploitation that has kept it in a perpetual state of dependence. The courageous actions of Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger demonstrate that asserting sovereignty and taking control of Africa’s resources is not only possible but necessary. This is a call to action for all African nations: to prioritize the welfare of their people, to build self-sustaining economies, and to reject foreign interference. Africa has the potential to rise as a global powerhouse, one that no longer depends on foreign aid or the approval of former colonial masters, but stands strong on its own terms. Only through true independence—political, economic, and social—can the continent unlock its full potential and secure a brighter future for generations to come. Bottom of Form

 

Goma Bleeds, But Goma Lives (Poetry)

Goma, my love, my wounded land,
Cradled in sorrow, carved by war’s hand.
The rivers run red, the earth sighs deep,
For too many souls now rest in sleep.

The wind hums hymns of shattered cries,
Mothers wail beneath darkened skies.
Fathers, broken, lost in the dust,
Children fading, swallowed by rust.

Tears carve rivers down hollowed cheeks,
Blood paints stories no tongue dares speak.
Sweat drips heavy, forging the ground,
Yet no harvest of peace is found.

The graves stretch wide, unmarked, unnamed,
Hopes extinguished, yet love remains.
For even in death, they whisper near,
Calling the world to see, to hear.

But where is justice? Where is grace?
Must sorrow be our only trace?
Oh Goma, still, your heartbeat drums,
Even as the darkness comes.

For though you bleed, you do not die,
Your spirit rises, defies the sky.
And one day soon, the war will cease,
And Goma will stand in the light of peace 

By Peter 'Maestro!' Mutanda